Retrieved from: senbooks.co.uk AssLearn.jpg |
There is growing
recognition that true/ false, multiple choice, and short answer tests do not
give a correct picture of what students know and have accomplished. These are
primarily measures of memorization and recall and do not always even test
comprehension. They certainly do not give students opportunities to demonstrate
that they can apply what they have learned or use their knowledge in creative
or even just practical ways. Many teachers have long used their own tests
involving such hands-on measures as the arts, constructions, dramatizations,
and multimedia reports. [1]
Brown and Hudson (1998) noted that to speak of alternative assessments is
counterproductive because the term implies something new and different that may
be "exempt from the requirements of responsible test construction"
(p. 657). So they proposed to refer to "alternatives" in assessment
instead. Their word is a perfect fit within a model that considers tests as a
subset of assessment.
Tests are highly practical and reliable instruments. They are designed to decrease time and money on the part of test-designer and test-taker, and to be precise in their scoring. Alternatives such as portfolios or conferencing with students on drafts of written work, or observations of learners over time all require considerable time and effort on the part of the teacher and the student. On the other hand, the alternative techniques also offer considerably greater wash back, are higher formative measures, and, because of their authenticity, usually carry higher face validity. [2]
Early in the decade of the 1990s, in a culture of rebellion against the notion that all people and all skills could be measured by traditional tests, that idea was to assemble additional measures of students—portfolios, journals, observations, self-assessments, peer-assessments, and the like—in an attempt to triangulate data about students.
retrieved from: www.itslearning.net wheel-en.png |
The features of alternatives in assessment:
- They require students to perform, create, produce or do something.
- They use real-world context or simulations.
- They allow students to be assessed on what they usually do in class
- They application tasks that represent meaningful instructional activities
- They focus on processes as well as products
- They tap into higher-level thinking and problem solving skills
Retrieved from: theglobalstudio.eu xAFL2008.png |
[1] School
of Education at Johns Hopkins University-Assessment ... (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://education.jhu.edu/PD/newhorizons/strategies/topics/Assessment%20Alternati
ves/index.html
[2] Brown, J.D. and Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly 32, 653–75.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario